****השוואה בין די הרבה סוגי כפכפים, אמ;לק:**** מבין כל
Reef Phantom Le, Men Flip Flops, Brown (Brown/Tan), 10 UK (44 EU)
****השוואה בין די הרבה סוגי כפכפים, אמ;לק:****
קודם כל לשים לב - מי שבדק את הכפכפים בעל רגליים צרות בין B ל C כאשר מדיום נחשב ל D
אבל הכפכפים רובם המוחלט מגיעים ב D, כאשר הוא מתכוון לכפכף רחב הכוונה שיתאים ל 2E/4E לפי מה שאני מבין
מבין כל סוגי הכפכפים שהבנאדם בדק, הוא הכי ממליץ על Reef Phantom LE אם מדובר על אותה מידה כמו שאתם בדר"כ ועל Reef Leather Slap ll רק שכאן צריך לקנות מידה אחת מעל מעל שאתם בדר"כ, ואת ה Reef Leather Slap ll הוא בעצם הכי אהב, רק שלא מצאתי אותם באמזון COM או UK.
לכפכפים Reef Draftsman ול Reef Mens Leather Fanning ll יש פותחן בירות בסוליה, כאשר ב Reef Draftsman מרגישים אותו בהליכה לפי מה שהוא כותב וב Mens Leather Fanning ll לא מרגישים - ככה שאין מה לקנות Reef Draftsman
החסרון של Reef Mens Leather Fanning ll הוא שהם כבדות, הכי כבדות מבין כל הכפכפים שהוא בדק. פעם היה פה טיפ שעדיף לקנות מידה מתחת למה שבדר"כ - בפוסט שלו הוא כותב שהן קצת משוחררות עליו - אולי באמת כדאי לקנות מידה מתחת, מציין שמעט יותר קשיחות מבחינת המשטח שדורכים עליו, אבל שהן נוחות והוא חושב שהן יחזיקו הרבה זמן.
Reef Phantoms לדבריו מותאמות לכפות רגליים רחבות יותר ביחס ל Phantom LE
כפכפים של Snook מתאימים ובנויים לרגליים רחבות, ברוב המקרים, שווה לחפש (ב amazon.com)
על Reef Twinpin שפורסמו כאן בכוורת היום אין לו משהו ממש טוב להגיד.
נראה לפי הכתוב שאין סיבה לקנות כפכפים של Teva ועדיף ללכת על ריף או סנוק ברוב המקרים
אני פרסמתי כאן בלינק הראשי של הפוסט את ה https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00C6MMN46 שיוצא עם משלוח 45 פאונד, אשמח אם מישהו יגיד לי כמה יוצא עם פריים.
I'm going to start this review by clarifying that I have a lean, narrow foot. I have a C toe and a B heel. So this review is biased towards a narrow foot. That being said, I have tried about twenty different sandals to find a couple that fit reasonably snug. So for comparison purposes this may be a useful guide for people. My preferences are light weight, comfortable, with a heel strike that has some padding. I also like moderate arch support. I don't want a lot of flop in my flip. I don't want a negative heel. I'm going to list the sandals I've tried, and give a brief comparison, which should be helpful to everyone. I'll start with this one:
Reef Phantom LE - (Mens 9) This leather sandal is much lighter than most of the others, weighing in at 142g. Somewhat more snug fitting than average. Very comfortable and attractive. Reasonably priced. This pair was a keeper for me.
Reef Mens Leather Fanning ll - (9 Mens) These are the heaviest of all the sandals I've tried, weighing in at 219 grams each. The footbed is comfortable but more firm than some of the others. Nice looking. They have an average fit, (fairly snug), but they were a little lose on me. I think these would last a long time. Unlike with the Reef Draftsman, I did not feel the bottle opener under my arch. Comfortable, but expensive and heavy.
Reef Leather Slap ll - (Mens 9) Oddly, this sandal was a full size shorter than any other Reefs I tried, (A full 1/2 inch), so order up. They weighed in at 205 grams each, making them the second heaviest in this comparison. Had they been the same size as the Fanning ll's they would have been the heaviest. Average fit. These are one of the most comfortable sandals in this line-up. Very cushy heel.
Reef Phantom Prints - (9) Weighing in at 113g, these were the second lightest sandal of the bunch. Snug fitting and comfortable, these are my personal favorites. Reasonably soft heel-strike with an average width footbed and just the right amount of arch support. They won't likely last as long as some of the heavier sandals, but they can be had for half the cost. I've seen them for $20 on up, depending on color and size.
Reef Phantoms - (Mens 10) These synthetic sandals seem to be made elsewhere from the other two Phantoms listed above. The fit is much different. They are wider in the footbed and sloppy fitting. These are made for a wide foot. Again, they are fairly light, weighing in at 134g, and I got these a full size up from the other two because everyone said they ran small. I think they run just a half size smaller.
Reef Draftsman - (9) This is a leather sandal with no additional heel support. It also has a bottle opener on the bottom. Nice looking, fairly snug fitting, and fairly light, (About 156g) but this sandal has an issue. As others have indicated, you can feel the bottle opener under your arch. I don't think anyone would be comfortable in these for long. I sent these back.
Reef Crew - (9) This leather sandal is fairly light at 138g each. They have a slender footbed and a somewhat snug fit. I like that, however, there is no additional heel support and they run as high as $60.
Reef Twinpin - (9) These basic synthetic leather sandals are fairly light at 137g each, and they have a slender footbed, but the thong is very lose and has no additional heel-strike.
Sanuk Fraid So - (10) These sandals weighed in at a modest 139g each and were really comfortable and attractive. I loved this sandal. Unfortunately, they have a very wide footbed and a very lose fitting thong. Yep, fraid so. But if you have fat feet, you'll love these.
Sanuk M Fraid - (9) These leather/poly sandals weighed in at 175g each, making them one of the heavier sandals here. They have a slender footbed, (A full half inch thinner than the Fraid So), but with a sloppy thong.
Sanuk Beer Cozy - (9) This fabric sandal has a wide footbed and a sloppy thong, but weighed in at a respectable 134g each. These have a very cushy, comfortable footbed. People rave about how comfortable they are. But you need to have fat or wide feet. Dang!
Teva Mush ll - (9) These are by far the lightest of the bunch, weighing in at a mere 92g each. They're also comfortable with a fairly narrow footbed and a snug thong. So, yes, I love these. And at $25 they are a bargain, even though they won't last as long as some of the more expensive sandals here. The middle of the heel-strike is a little harder than the surrounding area and some people have complained about it, but I haven't been bothered by it in the short periods of time I've spent in them.
Teva Men's Classic - (9) This is a very basic, uninspired sandal with a ruff, heavily textured, old school footbed. Perfect for some people, but I found them uncomfortable. It's light, but not as light as the Mush ll's. The thong was more loose than the Mush ll and it runs a little more money.
Teva Mush ll (Canvas) (9) I listed these as well because the canvas thong fits more loosely than the regular Mush ll's and weighed a little more. Other than that they have the same footbed.